Regulator wants to firm up pricing of illiquid securities

Finra is continuing to shake up the way broker-dealers show the value of illiquid investments such as nontraded real estate investment trusts and private placements on clients' account statements
JUL 24, 2011
Finra is continuing to shake up the way broker-dealers show the value of illiquid investments such as nontraded real estate investment trusts and private placements on clients' account statements. This month, the board of governors of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. authorized its staff to issue a regulatory notice on the amendments to the rule. The proposed amendments would change how client account statements showed an illiquid securities estimated value.

PAR VALUE

For example, the proposals include requiring broker-dealers to subtract upfront fees and expenses that are deducted from the offering proceeds if par value is listed as the estimated value of the shares. At the moment, shares of nontraded REITs, for example, are listed at par. Another proposal would permit broker-dealers to use par value for the investment only under the initial offering period, and not during the secondary period. And broker-dealers, already feeling the strain from new compliance guidelines, would have an extra hurdle of compliance under the proposed guidelines. The amendment would clarify that if the broker-dealer deemed the estimated per-share value in the offering's annual report inaccurate, the broker-dealer would have to remove that value from its account statements. Finra posted an update about its board of governors meeting to its website July 15. The estimated value of illiquid investments such as shares of non-traded REITs has been on Finra's radar since at least 2009. That was when Finra issued a notice to broker-dealers prohibiting firms from using data that were more than 18 months old to estimate the value of non-traded REITs after the REITs had concluded their offerings. Before that, broker-dealers routinely listed the estimated value of nontraded REITs at “par,” or at what price they had been sold to the public. This practice came under scrutiny during and after the credit crisis, when many nontraded REITs, which invest in commercial real estate, cut dividends and limited redemptions to in- vestors. Recently, the issue of the estimated value of a nontraded REIT again gained notice, as clients of David Lerner Associates Inc. at the end of last month received account statements in which the estimated value of shares in real estate investment trusts from Apple REIT Cos. Inc. was “not priced.” For years, shares of the Apple REITs were listed as $11 on client account statements. At the end of May, Finra filed a complaint against David Lerner Associates alleging that the firm was misleading investors and marketing unsuitable investment products to them. Nontraded REITs are sold primarily through independent-contractor broker-dealers. The industry has exploded, with the number of REIT products practically quadrupling to 45 over the past 10 years. Nancy Condon, a spokeswoman for Finra, said that the organization had no comment. Jessica Pochylski, a spokeswoman for David Lerner, wasn't available for comment. Email Bruce Kelly at bkelly@investmentnews.com

Latest News

Indie $8B RIA adds further leadership talent amid growth drive
Indie $8B RIA adds further leadership talent amid growth drive

Executives from LPL Financial, Cresset Partners hired for key roles.

Stock volatility remained low despite risk events
Stock volatility remained low despite risk events

Geopolitical tension has been managed well by the markets.

Fed minutes to provide signals on rate cuts
Fed minutes to provide signals on rate cuts

December cut is still a possiblity.

Trump's tariff talk roils markets, political leaders
Trump's tariff talk roils markets, political leaders

Canada, China among nations to react to president-elect's comments.

Ken Leech formally charged by SEC, US Attorney's Office
Ken Leech formally charged by SEC, US Attorney's Office

For several years, Leech allegedly favored some clients in trade allocations, at the cost of others, amounting to $600 million, according to the Department of Justice.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound