Finra pops Aegis Capital $2.75 million for churning

Finra pops Aegis Capital $2.75 million for churning
Over four years, the New York-based broker-dealer failed to identify trading that was potentially excessive and unsuitable in hundreds of customer accounts, according to Finra.
NOV 09, 2021

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. said Tuesday it sanctioned Aegis Capital Corp. $2.75 million for churning, or excessive trading in client accounts, from 2014 to 2018.

Aegis Capital, which is based in New York and has 300 retail registered reps, will pay close to $1.7 million in restitution to 68 customers whose accounts were "potentially excessively and unsuitably traded" by the firm’s brokers, according to Finra. The firm will also pay a $1.05 million fine for its supervisory violations.

As part of the settlement, Aegis Capital neither admitted nor denied Finra's findings.

"The referenced items occurred many years ago and relate solely to the activity of a discrete number of brokers," an attorney for the firm, Michael Ference, wrote in an email. "Aegis has subsequently invested significant capital to enhance its supervisory and compliance systems which has enabled Aegis to detect, monitor and prevent the referenced activity."  

Over the four-year period, Aegis Capital failed to identify trading that was potentially excessive and unsuitable in hundreds of customer accounts, including trading conducted by eight Aegis registered representatives in the firm’s Melville and Wall Street branches, according to Finra.

The trading by those eight brokers in the accounts of 31 Aegis customers resulted in an average annualized cost-to-equity ratio, or break-even point, of 71.6%. As a general rule of thumb, Finra and other regulators regard cost-to-equity ratios of 20% or more to be suggestive of excessive trading.

The trading by the eight brokers in the 31 customers' accounts also resulted in an average annualized turnover rate of 34.9, combined customer costs, including commissions, markups or markdowns, margin interest and fees, of more than $2.9 million, and cumulative losses of $4.6 million.

Aegis and its supervisors, Joseph Giordano and Roberto Birardi, failed to take reasonable steps to investigate numerous “red flags” indicative of potentially excessive and unsuitable trading by the firm's brokers, according to Finra.

The firm failed to act on more than 900 exception reports from its clearing firm that identified potentially unsuitable trading, and more than 50 complaints from customers alleging excessive, unsuitable or unauthorized trading in their accounts, according to Finra.

Giordano and Birardi respectively agreed to a six-month supervisory suspension and $10,000 fine, and a three-month supervisory suspension and $5,000 fine, according to Finra.

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound