The complexity of change — it's an issue that resounds across the economy in general, and the independent financial advisory industry in particular. Broker-dealer and custodian executives alike share many of the same business concerns — and faith that the solutions they seek are based in technology. However, these firms are not positioned to respond to the existing and emerging complexities of wealth management.
According to a recent IBM Midmarket Growth Business Executives Survey, 81 percent of respondents “expect the level of complexity to grow significantly over the next five years, but only 42 percent believe they know how to deal with it successfully.” For broker-dealers and custodians specifically, navigating complexity requires accommodating a large number of products and services that take them well beyond simple brokerage (and that their technology platforms were not designed to manage); evolving regulations; the new preferences of an emerging generation of tech-savvy wealthy people (which is also influencing the older generations); and an expanding reliance on technology to increase productivity and streamline the client experience.
InvestmentNews and Broadridge Financial Solutions gathered executives from leading independent broker-dealers and custodians to discuss emerging trends and evaluate how the industry will address the future of wealth management. “The complexity of the wealth management industry, coupled with evolving regulatory measures and generational shifts, are driving the need to reinvent the wealth management platform as we know it,” said Raghav Nandagopal, senior vice president of Broadridge.
Is the brokerage platform out-dated?
The advisor-client relationship has changed dramatically during the past decade. Ten years ago, advisors worked almost exclusively on a commission basis, and wealth management platforms were designed to support transactions. Advisors trumpeted their investment prowess and based their reputations on the returns they could deliver to clients.
After the 2008 financial crisis, most advisors learned that basing their reputation purely on investment performance left them unable to compete during bear markets. Now, the consultative, fee-based model of wealth management predominates, and it has brought about a new regard for long-term, holistic financial planning and client service. This requires that technology provide a unified, holistic experience for the advisor and client alike.
To provide that experience, platforms must aggregate performance data across various institutions, and then, integrate planning, portfolio accounting, trading, reporting and communications functions. For example, a client might have several investment accounts at various institutions plus a 401(k) with a plan provider; annuities through an insurance firm; and a trust account or partnership. To advise this client most effectively, a wealth manager would need to aggregate performance data from all the various accounts in one place and base recommendations on that complete picture.
Legacy transaction-based platforms persist, however, and force many enterprises to tie capabilities together. As a result, they frequently turn to outsourcers, who are specialists and can update and integrate their capabilities. Chief technology officers must stay current on outside developers and how their software connects both to the platform and to other applications. Technology shifts—such as the adoption of more sophisticated CRM systems and their integration with planning and portfolio management software—have gone on to empower new service models, like goal-based reporting, which ties account performance to long-term goals rather than investment benchmarks, liberating advisors from basing their value on investment performance.