It's time for dividend-paying stocks

Shift in investor focus to valuations and quality is a natural reaction to rising geopolitical risk.
JUL 09, 2014
It appears investors are finally paying more attention to valuations, quality and dividends. This shift is a natural reaction to increasing geopolitical risk (for example, Ukraine, China and Vietnam) and “just OK” economic growth. Investors have made a concerted move away from previous high-flying groups such as biotech and small-cap companies, and dot-com-like tech startups. Early bulls are taking profits, migrating to a more risk-averse stance and seeking out high-quality, dividend-paying stocks. Investors should gravitate toward dividend stocks, as volatility is likely to increase. Many likely will find solace in the high-quality dividend stock space, just as they found it in the 1930s, 1970s, 2000s (especially 2008), 2011, last quarter and in April. Simply put, they will want “GE,” not “gee-whiz.”

ALL-TIME HIGHS

The stock market is still resilient and trading near all-time highs. But investors appear increasingly nervous and are paying massive premiums for a very narrow portion of the market in order to achieve (or try to sustain) returns. Valuations for nondividend-paying stocks within the S&P 500 appear exceptionally high, on par or higher than 2007 levels. According to FactSet, the average trailing P/E for nondividend stocks in the S&P 500 was 27.7 times (cap-weighted) as of May 23, while the trailing P/E for dividend-paying stocks was 16.3 times. The average trailing price-to-book value for nondividend stocks was 3.6 times, versus 2.5 times (cap-weighted) for dividend stocks. The S&P 500's trailing P/E is 17.1 times, and price-to-book is 2.6 times.

MARGINAL IMPROVEMENT

Alarmingly, the average trailing P/E for nondividend stocks within the S&P 500 was 28.1 times on Sept. 30, 2007, and the average trailing price-to-book for nondividend stocks was 3.1 times. The economy is exhibiting only marginal improvement. Many risks are prevalent worldwide, and caution seems warranted. We also are entering the summer, traditionally a more volatile time for the markets. I have previously asserted that the “risk-on” trade will eventually end in tears; valuations, fundamentals, quality and dividends will become paramount to investors sooner or later, and I've asked when that will occur. It appears that many investors believe the answer is “now” or “soon.” Thus, I recommend that investors continue to seek high-quality, dividend-growth stocks. Though this philosophy lagged in 2012 and 2013, it is outperforming this year. Avoid low-quality, nondividend names, which are likely to be a source of funds as investors take profits from one-time momentum stocks that appear increasingly tired. Most important, investors will need more income when volatility picks up. They also will want downside protection and risk-averse returns. Have realistic expectations of the broad stock market and economy, but be optimistic about opportunities over the short to intermediate term via high-quality dividends. Investors will need some degree of certainty and income when reality hits. They will likely rotate into dividends. Matt McCormick is a principal and portfolio manager at Bahl & Gaynor Investment Counsel.

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound