Arkansas carrier charged with shortchanging cancer clients

The Missouri insurance department has sued Central United Life Insurance Co. for allegedly dodging claims from clients with cancer.
AUG 31, 2009
The Missouri insurance department has sued Central United Life Insurance Co. for allegedly dodging claims from clients with cancer. The suit against the Little Rock, Ark.-based carrier, filed in the Circuit Court of Cole County, Mo., accuses Central United of violating fair trade practices, and committing fraud and breach of contract. The carrier allegedly sold guaranteed renewable cancer health insurance policies, which contained “actual charge” benefits that allowed the contracts to pay benefits to policyholders based on the actual charge for cancer treatments, Mr. Huff said. Missouri's insurance director John M. Huff Prior to Feb. 1, 2003, Central United would pay these benefits based on the amount health care providers charged the insured parties or their primary health plan for service, according to the claim. However, after that date, the carrier began administering claims using the actual charges that were paid by the insured parties and accepted by the provider as full payment for the covered services provided. For example, if the charge for a certain treatment was $10,000, the health insurance company could negotiate that figure down to $6,500, according to a statement from Mr. Huff. That reduced the benefits the carrier paid to many policyholders who were supposed to have coverage for the actual cost of treatment. Central United also started requiring clients to file “explanation of benefit” forms, Medicare benefit summaries and other proof the policyholder had paid for the treatments, according to the suit. Central United also advertised its policies as “[paying] in addition to any other insurance, private or governmental, including Medicare, and directly to you or whomever you designate. No reduction in benefits at any age,” according to the suit. This ad and others like it gave clients the impression that the “actual charge” benefits were not affected by additional coverage a policyholder may have, when in fact the benefits did depend on other coverage, Mr. Huff alleged. The Missouri regulator seeks a permanent injunction against the company and its agents, and has ordered the firms to reprocess and pay all claims on “actual charge” benefit policies that were issued prior to Oct. 16, 2003, and 10% of any restitution ordered to an insurance consumer education program that's run by Mr. Huff's department. A call to Central United was not immediately returned.

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound