IN Voices

NOV 17, 2013
By  MFXFeeder
LTCI: Inexperience or incompetence? A story by reporter Darla Mercado about rate hike requests by the two largest providers of long-term-care insurance elicited several comments among readers. Most focused on an explanation offered by one expert as to why the insurers have kept coming back to policyholders asking for higher premiums — inexperience in writing the policies. Most readers were cynical of that explanation, though some were sympathetic. The sad fact of the matter here is what is seldom spoken about: These "brilliant' actuaries somehow failed to use gender pricing to determine premiums!! How in the heck did that happen? Life insurance? Gender pricing? Long-term-care insurance? Nah, forget it. It's almost mind-numbing to find a reason why they WOULDN'T do this! Unreal.” — Planner X, MBA, CMFC, CFP Inexperience? Not buying it. It was incompetence. Actuaries are pretty smart people, and it's hardly a revelation that interest rates have been largely flat for the last decade or that people are living much longer than 50 years ago. The latter, in particular, is not a new revelation. The insurance companies wanted to sell this product, priced it accordingly and now want regulators to bail them out of their own mess.” — RON_EDDE Odd that the insurers had the inexperience. My wife and I purchased LTC years ago because we realized the low rates were unsustainable. We did the financial calculations in our heads. Why would the insurance companies with their sophisticated cost analyses not have been able to see that their rates barely covered their initial commissions? There is more to this story than is being told. I don't know why the insurance companies priced LTC cheaply as they did, but I do not believe for a moment that "inexperience' had anything to do with it.” — claudew Two comments indicate that actuaries should have known that future interest rates were going to be 2%-3% for long-term bonds and 1%-1.5% for intermediate-term bonds for long periods of time. To be able to predict such a thing prior to 2008 would truly have been Nostradamus-like.” — OneFreeThinker I think the article fairly describes insurers' problems; there's no hidden agenda here. That said, I think LTC insurance is a dubious product. Uncertain costs, uncertain benefits ... far better for people to save and invest those premiums. Of course, that means no commissions to the vast sales force, which is what's keeping this product line on life support.” — loneMADman See Page 1 or go to InvestmentNews.com/ltcistory to read the article and comments.

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound