Moody's to eye insurance companies' recapitalization efforts

As some insurers recently made stock and debt offerings in lieu of participating in the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, Moody’s Investors Service said that it will review the way these recapitalization options affect carriers’ ratings.
JUN 02, 2009
As some insurers recently made stock and debt offerings in lieu of participating in the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, Moody’s Investors Service said that it will review the way these recapitalization options affect carriers’ ratings. Three of the six insurance companies offered participation in TARP have already declined. They are Allstate Corp. of Northbrook, Ill., Ameriprise Financial Inc. of Minneapolis and Prudential Financial Inc. of Newark, N.J. Three others — Hartford (Conn.) Financial Services Group Inc., Lincoln National Corp. of Radnor, Pa., and Principal Financial Group of Des Moines, Iowa — are still reviewing their options. Although many carriers have tried to strengthen their credit profiles by cutting back on riskier business segments and raising cash reserves, they have also tried to increase their capital and liquidity buffers by issuing debt, equity and hybrid securities in the capital markets, Moody’s noted in a report. The capital markets were less of an option at the height of last fall’s economic strife, but as the market climate has improved, a number of carriers have been able to announce offerings. They include Principal Financial and Prudential Financial. Aflac Inc. in Columbus, Ga., reportedly considered that possibility as well via a share offering, but the idea was placed on the back burner last week, according to published reports. TARP-like hybrid securities, as well as traditional market-placed debt or equity or cash raised at a viable cost could help carriers’ financial flexibility at this time. New York-based Moody’s said that when assessing ratings, it would consider the purposes for which the capital raised will be used. For instance, will it be kept at the holding-company level for a liquidity cushion or added to operating companies to raise their capital? In the former situation, the funding would be considered operating leverage, while under the latter scenario, Moody’s would consider the capital to be financial leverage. Nevertheless, continuing credit concerns about carriers’ profitability and risk management will still remain even after an increase in capital, the agency said.

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound