Geithner eases fears about mutual fund regulation — sort of

Geithner eases fears about mutual fund regulation — sort of
Treasury Secretary addresses issue of whether funds are too big too fail; well, are they or aren't they?
MAY 06, 2011
Based on what Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said yesterday, it seems pretty unlikely that all mutual funds are going to be designated as systemically important financial institutions under Dodd-Frank. In a question and answer session at the Investment Company Institute's Annual General Membership Meeting Wednesday, Paul Schott Stevens, president and CEO of the ICI, asked the Treasury Secretary whether he is considering a broad or narrow definition of what a systemically important financial institution should be. In response, Mr. Geithner said the debate shouldn't be about how broad or narrow the designation is. “It should be about whether an institution can have the same inherent risk that comes with borrowing short so you can invest long term in a size that matters.” Specifically, Mr. Geithner wants to make sure that institutions that are acting as investment banks — through the use of leverage — are regulated as such. What Mr. Geithner wants is very important to the mutual fund business. Under the Dodd-Frank legislation, Congress created the Financial Stability Oversight Council, a group of financial regulators to identify institutions that potentially could destabilize markets. The FSOC is expected to designate which institutions — both banks and, importantly non-banks — could pose substantial risk to the system by year-end. Mr. Geithner is chair of that council. The mutual fund industry has been fighting to keep itself out of the FSOC's sights, claiming that the funds don't inherently pose the same kinds of liquidity challenges to the system that other institutions do. At yesterday's gathering, Mr. Geithner seemed to assuage those fears. He noted that establishing a broad designation could pose problems. For example, the FSOC wants to make sure it has a system in place which prevents a company from operating as a bank one day, and then flipping their charter to become a thrift simply to avoid regulation. “This is not something you can lock in and never change," he said, "because the market will adapt."

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound