Morgan Stanley ordered to pay $8.8 million for unsupervised trading

Morgan Stanley ordered to pay $8.8 million for unsupervised trading
SEC orders the wirehouse to pay $8.8M for what the regulator claims was unsupervised prearranged trading. Brokerage firm Societe Generale Americas also agreed to pay $1M for the same case.
DEC 22, 2015
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced it has ordered Morgan Stanley Investment Management and brokerage firm Societe Generale Americas to pay $8.8 million and $1 million respectively for what the regulator claims was unsupervised prearranged trading conducted by a portfolio manager and a trader. In what the SEC called an attempt to give certain clients preferential treatment, Morgan Stanley portfolio manager Sheila Huang allegedly arranged the sales of mortgage-backed securities to Societe Generale trader Yimin Ge at predetermined prices in 2011 and 2012. She then bought them back at a small markup. She also sold bonds at above-market prices but repurchased them at “unfavorable prices,” without disclosing this to the client, the SEC said in a press release on Tuesday. The scheme is known as “parking,” according to the release. Marshall S. Sprung, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit, said Morgan Stanley failed to see what Ms. Huang was doing because of the firm's lack of supervisory oversight and failure to implement policies against these acts. “Instead of playing by the rules, [Ms.] Huang engaged in prearranged trading schemes that benefited some clients while harming others,” Mr. Sprung said. Morgan Stanley neither admitted nor denied the charges, but agreed to pay an $8 million penalty and a reimbursement of about $858,000 to the client accounts who were affected. Ms. Huang also neither admitted nor denied the charges, but has agreed to pay a $125,000 penalty. She has been barred from the industry for at least five years. A Morgan Stanley spokesman said the firm has taken “appropriate compensatory action with respect to clients harmed by the misconduct.” “The actions of this former employee stand in stark contrast to our firm's commitment to integrity and the highest standards of ethical conduct,” he added. In a separate order, the SEC found Societe Generale failed to supervise Ms. Ge. Societe Generale neither admitted nor denied the charges, but agreed to pay an $800,000 penalty and $211,000 in disgorgement and prejudgement interest. Societe Generale did not respond to a request for comment. Ms. Ge no longer works at the firm and has agreed to pay a $25,000 penalty. She is also barred from the industry for at least three years, according to the SEC press release. A BrokerCheck search on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority website found that Ms. Ge was barred as of Oct. 27, 2014.

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound