Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. last week lost another Finra arbitration case involving an alleged Ponzi scheme run by a former broker.
A unanimous three-person Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel ordered Oppenheimer to pay $1,483,670 in compensatory damages to two investors, Bruce Cullen Sr. and Rosemarie Cullen, according to the March 2 award.
In their arbitration claim filed in November 2021, the Cullens said their cause of action against Oppenheimer involved investments in the private equity fund Horizon Private Equity III.
The fund was also at the heart of Oppenheimer’s $36.7 million Finra arbitration loss last September involving eight other investors. The fund was run by a former Oppenheimer broker, John J. Woods.
In August 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed charges against Woods, alleging that he operated a $110 million Ponzi scheme tied to Horizon. The SEC said Horizon raised capital from more than 400 investors in 20 states.
“Horizon did not earn any significant profits from legitimate investments, and a very large percentage of purported ‘returns’ to earlier investors were simply paid out of new investor money,” the agency said in an Aug. 25, 2021, statement.
The Cullens claimed that Oppenheimer violated Finra supervision rules as well as California law. The firm denied the allegations, according to the award document. The Cullens sought $2.5 million in compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, attorneys’ fees and other damages.
The arbitrators dismissed motions by Oppenheimer to dismiss the case and to postpone the hearing.
A lawyer for the Cullens declined to comment. Oppenheimer also declined to comment.
Woods, who is no longer registered as a broker, had 43 regulatory disclosures over 27 years in the industry working for three different firms, according to his BrokerCheck record.
Executives from LPL Financial, Cresset Partners hired for key roles.
Geopolitical tension has been managed well by the markets.
December cut is still a possiblity.
Canada, China among nations to react to president-elect's comments.
For several years, Leech allegedly favored some clients in trade allocations, at the cost of others, amounting to $600 million, according to the Department of Justice.
Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions
This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound