The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has announced a new public registry to help identify repeat offenders among nonbanks and other financial firms.
Firms that have broken consumer laws and are subject to orders from federal, state, or local government or courts, will be added to the platform to enable easier tracking of orders following enforcement action. The information is already publicly available, but orders are not comprehensively tracked.
“Too often, financial firms treat penalties for illegal activity as the cost of doing business,” said CFPB director Rohit Chopra. “The CFPB’s new rule will help law enforcement across the country detect and stop repeat offenders.”
CFPB expects the registry to be used by investors and other members of the public in their due diligence or research into financial firms, and by state attorneys general, regulators, and law enforcement to identify companies that may restart a scam, fraudulent scheme, or other illegal conduct that harms the public.
“Nonbank firms are often licensed and regulated at the state level, but problems can have consequences across the nation, Chopra said. “During the early 2000s states had attempted to stop many of the abuses in the mortgage market, including those perpetrated by nonbanks, but were consistently rebuffed by federal regulators.”
The authority given to the CFPB by the Consumer Financial Protection Act allows it to register nonbanks to help it monitor their risks to consumers. The finalizing of the rule to establish the registry is the first time the CFPB has utilized the authority to register nonbank entities.
It means that covered nonbanks will have to:
It’s expected that the rule will help stop repeat offenders including mortgage and payday lenders, debt collectors, and credit reporting companies.
Executives from LPL Financial, Cresset Partners hired for key roles.
Geopolitical tension has been managed well by the markets.
December cut is still a possiblity.
Canada, China among nations to react to president-elect's comments.
For several years, Leech allegedly favored some clients in trade allocations, at the cost of others, amounting to $600 million, according to the Department of Justice.
Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions
This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound