The Supreme Court limited the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission to recoup illegal profits from wrongdoers, putting new curbs on one of the agency’s most potent legal weapons.
The 8-1 ruling Monday is a partial victory for a California couple ordered to pay $27 million after being found to have defrauded investors.
The justices said the SEC can win “disgorgement” in federal court if the money can be used to reimburse defrauded investors and is capped at the wrongdoer’s net profits. But the court also suggested that awards can’t go further, putting a new constraint on the agency’s enforcement efforts.
Disgorgement is a traditional tool used by judges to return wrongful gains to the victims. It’s distinct from SEC fines, which the SEC can also seek and which can be used as punishment.
The SEC typically wins more than $1 billion a year in disgorgement orders in federal court. The ruling didn’t directly affect the SEC’s separate authority to seek disgorgement through administrative proceedings.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the court’s majority opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, saying he would have gone further and barred the SEC from seeking disgorgement at all in federal court.
New chief executive Rich Steinmeier replaced Dan Arnold on October 1.
The global firm is navigating a crisis of confidence as an SEC and DOJ probe into its Western Asset Management business sparked a historic $37B exodus.
Beyond returns, asset managers have to elevate their relationship with digital applications and a multichannel strategy, says JD Power.
New survey finds varied levels of loyalty to advisors by generation.
Busy day for results, key data give markets concerns.
A great man died recently, but this did not make headlines. In fact, it barely even made the news. Maybe it’s because many have already mourned the departure of his greatest legacy: the 60/40 portfolio.
Discover the award-winning strategies behind Destiny Wealth Partners' client-centric approach.
