Virginia poised to ban mandatory arbitration clauses for state-registered advisers

Virginia poised to ban mandatory arbitration clauses for state-registered advisers
State regulator said limitation is 'contrary to fiduciary duty.'
SEP 09, 2019
Investment advisers registered in Virginia will soon not be able to force clients into arbitration to settle disputes. A new state rule will go into effect on Sept. 16 that bans mandatory arbitration clauses in client contracts, according to Ron Thomas, director of the Virginia Division of Securities and Retail Franchising. "It's totally contrary to the fiduciary duty of an investment adviser to take away a right someone has to pursue the forum of their choice if they have a disagreement with an investment adviser," Mr. Thomas said in an interview at the North American Securities Administrators Association annual conference in Austin, Tex. Mr. Thomas and NASAA officials say Virginia is the first state to ban mandatory arbitration for advisers. The issue of mandatory arbitration usually centers on brokers, who include such clauses in nearly every customer contract. But many advisers also use them. Broker arbitration is handled by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., while adviser clients usually use other arbitration systems. [Recommended video: What makes ETFs a great structure for innovation?] The Dodd-Frank financial reform law gave the Securities and Exchange Commission the authority to ban mandatory arbitration for brokers, but the agency has not acted. The Virginia rule emanated from adviser exams that state regulators conducted, according to Mr. Thomas. When they saw advisers using mandatory arbitration, they asked them to remove the clauses from client agreements. (More: Small advice firms show increase in cyber-related issues) "We never had anyone refuse to take it out of their contract, so I thought it was time to codify it in a rule," Mr. Thomas said. The rule was proposed in late June with a comment deadline of Aug. 9. Mr. Thomas said he didn't receive any adviser opposition during the rulemaking process and no one requested a hearing. He said he is not opposed to arbitration for dispute resolution, if that's the venue that a client selects. "If they want to do it, fine," Mr. Thomas said. "I could care less, if they have a choice."

Latest News

Former Wells Fargo exec Brendan Krebs emerges at PNC
Former Wells Fargo exec Brendan Krebs emerges at PNC

The 25-year industry veteran previously in charge of the Wall Street bank's advisor recruitment efforts is now fulfilling a similar role at a rival firm.

Trio of advisors switch for 'Happier' times at LPL Financial
Trio of advisors switch for 'Happier' times at LPL Financial

Former Northwestern Mutual advisors join firm for independence.

Indie $8B RIA adds further leadership talent amid growth drive
Indie $8B RIA adds further leadership talent amid growth drive

Executives from LPL Financial, Cresset Partners hired for key roles.

Stock volatility remained low despite risk events
Stock volatility remained low despite risk events

Geopolitical tension has been managed well by the markets.

Fed minutes to provide signals on rate cuts
Fed minutes to provide signals on rate cuts

December cut is still a possiblity.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound