How taxpayers hurt themselves with nondeductible IRA contributions

There's only one way to ensure you get the full tax benefit of those contributions.
MAR 24, 2017

By now nearly all taxpayers have begun the arduous task of compiling the information needed to prepare their 2016 tax return, including sifting through receipts and statements to determine what's needed for the return and what is just noise. That's especially true for those who hire a CPA to prepare their tax return — you don't want to pay to have them spend their time going through useless information. In those cases, you may be tempted to not include things you think won't impact your return, like, for example, the IRA contribution you know you can't deduct because your income is too high to qualify. In the case of those IRA contributions, at least, that would be a big mistake. THE IRS NEEDS TO KNOW First, let's quickly review the rules on deducting IRA contributions. Taxpayers who aren't covered by an employer retirement plan can always deduct their contribution, but those who are covered are subject to an income limit. For 2016, married couples with modified adjusted gross income over $98,000 (and singles over $61,000) begin to lose the ability to deduct their contribution. If there's no immediate tax benefit for contribution, why make it? Because at least the growth on that amount can be sheltered inside the IRA until it's withdrawn. Plus, those who don't have any other money in traditional IRAs can take advantage of the backdoor Roth conversion strategy. In fact, that strategy is based primarily on the nondeductible traditional IRA contribution, so those contributions are becoming more commonplace. While the growth on those contributions is taxable when withdrawn, the contribution itself is withdrawn tax-free, albeit on a pro rata basis with any pre-tax funds in the IRA. And therein lies the reason why you need to tell your tax preparer about these contributions: How does the IRS know that there really is after-tax money inside the IRA? Taxpayers often expect their IRA trustee to report the taxable and tax-free portion of IRA withdrawals. However, that IRA trustee doesn't necessarily know that you didn't take a tax deduction for your IRA contribution. Even if they do, the pro rata rule applies to all IRAs owned by a taxpayer, so when IRAs are spread across multiple firms, there's no way a trustee could calculate the tax-free portion of the withdrawal. FORM 8606 TO THE RESCUE That's where IRS Form 8606 comes in, a form that serves multiple purposes. First, it's used to let the IRS know you've made a nondeductible contribution to your traditional IRA. It's also used to track those contributions over time by keeping a running total. Every year you make a nondeductible IRA contribution, you need to complete this form. Second, this form is used to do the pro rata calculation needed to figure out the tax-exempt portion of the IRA withdrawal. It also tracks the amount of contributions remaining in the IRA after each withdrawal in order to recalculate the tax-free percentage each year. So what happens when you have been making nondeductible contributions for years, but never bothered to report them on the 8606? The good news is the IRS allows taxpayers to file these forms for prior years in order to catch up on their reporting. The bad news: You have to use the form that was issued for the year the contribution was made, which means digging through the IRS website to find old forms. There is also a $50 penalty for each form that was filed after the normal filing deadline. So, while you may think you're doing your tax preparer a favor by not mentioning your nondeductible IRA contribution, you're only hurting yourself. Form 8606 is the only way to ensure you get the full tax benefit of those contributions. Tim Steffen is director of financial planning for Baird. Follow him on Twitter @TimSteffenCPA.

Latest News

LPL building out alts, banking services to chase wirehouse advisors, new CEO says
LPL building out alts, banking services to chase wirehouse advisors, new CEO says

New chief executive Rich Steinmeier replaced Dan Arnold on October 1.

Franklin Templeton CEO vows to "do what's right" amid record outflows
Franklin Templeton CEO vows to "do what's right" amid record outflows

The global firm is navigating a crisis of confidence as an SEC and DOJ probe into its Western Asset Management business sparked a historic $37B exodus.

For asset managers, easy experience is key to winning advisors' businesses
For asset managers, easy experience is key to winning advisors' businesses

Beyond returns, asset managers have to elevate their relationship with digital applications and a multichannel strategy, says JD Power.

Why retaining HNW clients ultimately comes down to one basic thing
Why retaining HNW clients ultimately comes down to one basic thing

New survey finds varied levels of loyalty to advisors by generation.

Stocks drop as investors digest Microsoft, Meta earnings
Stocks drop as investors digest Microsoft, Meta earnings

Busy day for results, key data give markets concerns.

SPONSORED Out with the old and in with the new: a 50% private markets portfolio

A great man died recently, but this did not make headlines. In fact, it barely even made the news. Maybe it’s because many have already mourned the departure of his greatest legacy: the 60/40 portfolio.

SPONSORED Destiny Wealth Partners: RIA Team of the Year shares keys to success

Discover the award-winning strategies behind Destiny Wealth Partners' client-centric approach.