Nursing homes bleed assets dry: Study

Median household wealth zapped by stay of over thirty days; the good news — once you're broke, Medicare kicks in
DEC 07, 2012
Staying in a nursing home is bad for your financial health. Very bad. A recent analysis by the Employee Benefit Research Institute shows that receiving care in a nursing home drastically depletes assets. Using data from a health and retirement study that's sponsored by the National Institute on Aging and the Social Security Administration, EBRI grouped individuals over age 65 into three segments: Individuals who spent less than 30 nights in a nursing home; those who spent 31 to 180 nights there; and those who spent more than 180 days in such a facility. Median total household wealth for the group that spent less than a month in a nursing facility was $108,300. But the group that spent anywhere from a month to six months at a nursing home had a median total household wealth of $67,836. Wealth plummeted even more for those who spent more than six months at a home, plunging to $5,518, according to the EBRI study. In most cases, Medicare doesn't cover the cost of a nursing home stay, requiring most individuals to pick up the tab themselves. This, in turn, depletes assets until a patient eventually becomes sufficiently impoverished to qualify for Medicaid. Indeed, about half of the individuals who ended up spending half a year at a nursing facility were covered by Medicaid. RELATED ITEM Most expensive states for assisted living » The value of financial assets exclusive of the primary residence also takes a dive. Median financial wealth for people who spend less than a month at a nursing home is $28,510, which declines to $12,562 for people who stay between a month and six months. Financial wealth hits $1,090 for people who spend more than six months at a facility. The results of the study should make the case for long-term-care insurance. But EBRI researcher and study author Sudipto Banerjee noted that of, the individuals who went to a nursing home, only 14% had long-term-care insurance. He also said that when studied over time, respondents become more likely to buy long-term-care coverage when they believe they have a higher probability of moving into a nursing facility. Even then, the number of people who actually buy the coverage remains low. “In 2010, within the group which reported a 50% to 75% likelihood of moving into a nursing home in the next five years, approximately one in four report purchasing such insurance,” Mr. Banerjee wrote. “A possible explanation for this might be that LTCI is expensive.”

Latest News

The power of cultivating personal connections
The power of cultivating personal connections

Relationships are key to our business but advisors are often slow to engage in specific activities designed to foster them.

A variety of succession options
A variety of succession options

Whichever path you go down, act now while you're still in control.

'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists
'I’ll never recommend bitcoin,' advisor insists

Pro-bitcoin professionals, however, say the cryptocurrency has ushered in change.

LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade
LPL raises target for advisors’ bonuses for first time in a decade

“LPL has evolved significantly over the last decade and still wants to scale up,” says one industry executive.

What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?
What do older Americans have to say about long-term care?

Survey findings from the Nationwide Retirement Institute offers pearls of planning wisdom from 60- to 65-year-olds, as well as insights into concerns.

SPONSORED The future of prospecting: Say goodbye to cold calls and hello to smart connections

Streamline your outreach with Aidentified's AI-driven solutions

SPONSORED A bumpy start to autumn but more positives ahead

This season’s market volatility: Positioning for rate relief, income growth and the AI rebound