The case for relocating your irrevocable trust

What do you do when you have an irrevocable trust in a state with hefty income taxes or weak creditor protection laws? Create a new one in a new jurisdiction. Decanting an irrevocable trust is an estate-planning technique that's picking up steam among attorneys and estate planners. Essentially, decanting a trust involves distributing the assets from an old one to a new one with more favorable terms that will better meet the needs of the investor. Currently, about 20 states have statutes that permit the technique. There are a number of planning scenarios that could call for decanting: For instance, a case in which a trust has staggered distributions to the beneficiary at different ages. Perhaps it's better to decant and create a dynasty trust so that multiple generations can benefit from divorce, creditor and bankruptcy protection, according to Steven J. Oshins, an attorney at the Law Offices of Oshins and Associates. Moving the assets of a trust from one state to another also falls under decanting. William R. Fleming, managing director in the personal financial services division of PricewaterhouseCoopers, pointed to three reasons why investors might consider this strategy. First, investors may want to move a trust because of situation in which certain state rules could be interpreted in favor of the trustee or the beneficiary. “Rights under state law may enhance or supersede the powers within the trust document itself,” said Mr. Fleming. “Depending on the state, it may be more trustee or beneficiary friendly.” A second reason to move a trust: Some states have favorable laws on perpetuities for dynasty trusts. In Florida, for instance, trusts can last as long as 360 years. Finally, state income taxes are a driver in the decision: Investors might want to move a trust to a jurisdiction with no state income taxes. There are a series of steps investors and their estate planners should consider when it comes to picking out a state. First, make sure the trust has a provision that permits the trustee to move to another jurisdiction. If the trust can be moved, then there should be no problem making that move in writing and ensuring that a co-trustee or sole trustee in the new jurisdiction is appointed, Mr. Oshins noted. If the trust document doesn't have a provision in it that permits a move, then depending on whether the current jurisdiction allows decanting, the investor can decant the trust to include a provision that will allow the move — and then move the trust. Read next: The differences between revocable trust and irrevocable trust  Though having the provision makes it easy to move the trust, it doesn't necessarily protect against state long-arm statutes that will continue to tax the trust even after it's in a new jurisdiction, said Mr. Oshins. For instance, some states might instead tax the trust based on the residency of the grantor who set it up. Regardless where that trust ends up, it's still subject to the state income taxes of the grantor's residence. In that case, “you're better off moving out of the state if you want to set up a large trust,” said Mr. Oshins. “Perhaps buy a summer home in a no-state-income-tax jurisdiction and then make a large gift into your trust.” Another thing to watch out for when evaluating states is what the move could mean not just for the creator of the trust, but the trustee and the beneficiary from a tax perspective. “What's common is if we have trustees move to California, we get them to resign [their trusteeships] right away,” said Mr. Fleming. “California will tax the trustee if they are a resident.” When decanting a trust, investors also must bear in mind how they will report it on a tax return and ensure they know where any applicable tax payments are going, as well as the new trust ID number, Mr. Fleming said. At the beginning of this year, Mr. Oshins launched his first annual trust decanting state rankings chart, a list of 22 jurisdictions ranked based on seven criteria:

1. Does the state permit decanting in its statutes?
2. Does the state statute permit the decanting of trusts with ascertainable standards for distributions — a standard that defines the property as being used for the health, education, maintenance and support?
3. Does the state statute require the trustee to send notice to the trust's beneficiaries?
4. Does the state statute permit a trust with an ascertainable standard to be decanted into a discretionary trust (which provides greater credit protection)? And does the statute permit the trustee to remove a mandatory income interest (a provision that requires an income distribution to a beneficiary)?
5. Does the state statute permit the trustee to decant into a trust that empowers the beneficiary to assign assets to someone who wasn't already a beneficiary of the first trust?
6. Is the state a favorable jurisdiction for dynasty trusts?
7. Is the state a favorable jurisdiction for domestic asset protection trusts?

Learn more and try out some of asset protection trusts strategies for estate planning in this guide.